Translate

Thursday, 7 April 2022

Copy of the IPCC press release of 4 April 2022- We all need to make changes!

 2022/15/PR
4 April 2022

IPCC PRESS RELEASE

The evidence is clear: the time for action is now. We can halve emissions by 2030.

GENEVA, Apr 4 In 2010-2019 average annual global greenhouse gas emissions were at their highest levels in human history, but the rate of growth has slowed. Without immediate and deep emissions reductions across all sectors, limiting global warming to 1.5°C is beyond reach. However, there is increasing evidence of climate action, said scientists in the latest Intergovernmental Panelon Climate Change (IPCC) report released today.

Since 2010, there have been sustained decreases of up to 85% in the costs of solar and wind energy, and batteries. An increasing range of policies and laws have enhanced energy efficiency, reduced rates of deforestation and accelerated the deployment of renewable energy.

“We are at a crossroads.
The decisions we make now can secure a liveable future. We have the tools and know-how required to limit warming, said IPCC Chair Hoesung Lee. I am encouraged by climate action being taken in many countries. There are policies, regulations and market instruments that are proving effective. If these are scaled up and applied more widely and equitably, they can support deep emissions reductions and stimulate innovation.”
 

The Summary for Policymakers of the IPCC Working Group III report, Climate Change 2022:
 

Mitigation of climate change was approved on April 4 2022, by 195 member governments of the IPCC, through a virtual approval session that started on March 21. It is the third instalment of the IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), which will be completed this year.
We have options in all sectors to at least halve emissions by 2030

Limiting global warming will require major transitions in the energy sector. This will involve a substantial reduction in fossil fuel use, widespread electrification, improved energy efficiency, and use of alternative fuels (such as hydrogen).

Having the right policies, infrastructure and technology in place to enable changes to our lifestyles and behaviour can result in a 40-70% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. This offers significant untapped potential, said IPCC Working Group III Co-Chair Priyadarshi Shukla. “The evidence also shows that these lifestyle changes can improve our health and wellbeing.

Cities and other urban areas also offer significant opportunities for emissions reductions. These can be achieved through lower energy consumption (such as by creating compact, walkable cities), electrification of transport in combination with low-emission energy sources, and enhanced carbon uptake and storage using nature. There are options for established, rapidly growing and new cities.

We see examples of zero energy or zero-carbon buildings in almost all climates, said IPCC Working Group III Co-Chair Jim Skea. “Action in this decade is critical to capture the mitigation potential of buildings

 - 2 -

Reducing emissions in industry will involve using materials more efficiently, reusing and recycling products and minimising waste. For basic materials, including steel, building materials and chemicals, low- to zero-greenhouse gas production processes are at their pilot to near-commercial stage.
This sector accounts for about a quarter of global emissions. Achieving net zero will be challenging and will require new production processes, low and zero emissions electricity, hydrogen, and, where necessary, carbon capture and storage.

Agriculture, forestry, and other land use can provide large-scale emissions reductions and also remove and store carbon dioxide at scale. However, land cannot compensate for delayed emissions reductions in other sectors. Response options can benefit biodiversity, help us adapt to climate change, and secure livelihoods, food and water, and wood supplies.

The next few years are critical
In the scenarios we assessed, limiting warming to around 1.5°C (2.7°F) requires global greenhouse gas emissions to peak before 2025 at the latest, and be reduced by 43% by 2030; at the same time,
methane would also need to be reduced by about a third. Even if we do this, it is almost inevitable that we will temporarily exceed this temperature threshold but could return to below it by the end of the century.

“It’s now or never, if we want to limit global warming to 1.5°C (2.7°F), said Skea. “Without mmediate and deep emissions reductions across all sectors, it will be impossible.

The global temperature will stabilise when carbon dioxide emissions reach net zero. For 1.5°C (2.7°F), this means achieving net zero carbon dioxide emissions globally in the early 2050s; for 2°C (3.6°F), it is in the early 2070s.

This assessment shows that limiting warming to around 2°C (3.6°F) still requires global greenhouse gas emissions to peak before 2025 at the latest, and be reduced by a quarter by 2030.

Closing investment gaps

The report looks beyond technologies and demonstrates that while financial flows are a factor of three to six times lower than levels needed by 2030 to limit warming to below 2°C (3.6°F), there is sufficient global capital and liquidity to close investment gaps. However, it relies on clear signalling from governments and the international community, including a stronger alignment of public sector finance and policy.

Without taking into account the economic benefits of reduced adaptation costs or avoided climate impacts, global Gross Domestic Product (GDP) would be just a few percentage points lower in 2050 if we take the actions necessary to limit warming to 2°C (3.6°F) or below, compared to maintaining current policies,” said Shukla.

Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals

Accelerated and equitable climate action in mitigating and adapting to climate change impacts is critical to sustainable development. Some response options can absorb and store carbon and, at the same time, help communities limit the impacts associated with climate change. For example, in cities, networks of parks and open spaces, wetlands and urban agriculture can reduce flood risk and reduce heat-island effects.

Mitigation in industry can reduce environmental impacts and increase employment and business opportunities. Electrification with renewables and shifts in public transport can enhance health,employment, and equity.
 

- 3 -
 

Climate change is the result of more than a century of unsustainable energy and land use, lifestyles and patterns of consumption and production, said Skea. This report shows how taking action now can move us towards a fairer, more sustainable world.

For more information, please contact:

IPCC Press Office, Email:
ipcc-media@wmo.int
IPCC Working Group III:
Sigourney Luz:
s.luz@ipcc-wg3.ac.uk

Follow IPCC on
Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and Instagram
Notes for editors:

Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

The Working Group III report provides an updated global assessment of climate change mitigation progress and pledges, and examines the sources of global emissions. It explains developments in emission reduction and mitigation efforts, assessing the impact of national climate pledges in relation to long-term emissions goals.

Working Group III introduces several new components in its latest report: One is a new chapter on the social aspects of mitigation, which explores the ‘demand side’, i.e. what drives consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. This chapter is a partner to the sectoral chapters in the report, which explore the ‘supply side’ of climate change - what produces emissions. There is also a cross-sector chapter on mitigation options that cut across sectors, including carbon dioxide removal techniques.
And there is a new chapter on innovation, technology development and transfer, which describes how a well-established innovation system at a national level, guided by well-designed policies, can contribute to mitigation, adaptation and achieving the sustainable development goals, while avoiding undesired consequences.

The Summary for Policymakers of the Working Group III contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) as well as additional materials and information are available
at
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/
Note: Originally scheduled for release in July 2021, the report was delayed for several months by the COVID-19 pandemic, as work in the scientific community including the IPCC shifted online. This is the third time that the IPCC has conducted a virtual approval session for one of its reports.

 

AR6 Working Group III in numbers
278 authors from 65 countries

36 coordinating lead authors

163 lead authors

38 review editors
plus
354 contributing authors

Over 18,000 cited references

A total of 59,212 expert and government review comments

(First Order Draft 21,703; Second Order Draft 32,555; Final Government Distribution: 4, 954)

 

About the IPCC

- 4 -  

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is the UN body for assessing the science related to climate change. It was established by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) in 1988 to provide political leaders with periodic scientific assessments concerning climate change, its implications and risks, as well as to put forward adaptation and mitigation strategies. In the same year the UN General Assembly endorsed the action by the WMO and UNEP in jointly establishing the IPCC. It has 195 member states.
Thousands of people from all over the world contribute to the work of the IPCC. For the assessment reports, experts volunteer their time as IPCC authors to assess the thousands of scientific papers published each year to provide a comprehensive summary of what is known about the drivers of climate change, its impacts and future risks, and how adaptation and mitigation can reduce those risks.

The IPCC has three working groups:
Working Group I, dealing with the physical science basis of climate change; Working Group II, dealing with impacts, adaptation and vulnerability; and Working Group III, dealing with the mitigation of climate change. It also has a Task Force on National
Greenhouse Gas Inventories
that develops methodologies for measuring emissions and removals.
IPCC assessments provide governments, at all levels, with scientific information that they can use to develop climate policies. IPCC assessments are a key input into the international negotiations to tackle climate change. IPCC reports are drafted and reviewed in several stages, thus guaranteeing objectivity and transparency.

About the Sixth Assessment Cycle

Comprehensive scientific assessment reports are published every 6 to 7 years; the latest, the
Fifth Assessment Report, was completed in 2014 and provided the main scientific input to the Paris Agreement.
At its 41st Session in February 2015, the IPCC decided to produce a
Sixth Assessment Report (AR6). At its 42nd Session in October 2015 it elected a new Bureau that would oversee the work on this report and Special Reports to be produced in the assessment cycle. At its 43rd Session in April 2016, it decided to produce three Special Reports, a Methodology Report and AR6.
The Working Group I contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report
Climate Change 2021: the Physical Science Basis was released on 9 August 2021.

The Working Group II contribution, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, was released on 28 February 2022.
The concluding Synthesis Report is due in autumn 2022.

The IPCC also publishes special reports on more specific issues between assessment reports.

Global Warming of 1.5°C
, an IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7°F) above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable
development, and efforts to eradicate poverty was launched in October 2018.

Climate Change and Land
, an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems was launched in August 2019, and the Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate was released in September 2019.
In May 2019 the IPCC released the
2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, an update to the methodology used by governments to estimate their greenhouse gas emissions and removals.

- 5 -
For more information visit
www.ipcc.ch.
The website includes
outreach materials including videos about the IPCC and video recordings from outreach events conducted as webinars or live-streamed events.
Most videos published by the IPCC can be found on our
YouTube channel.
**

Please let us all realise that is in our hands to put this right. We cannot leave it up to the governments to make these changes and do nothing ourselves. I am certain that if we all made a few small lifestyle changes then good things would happen! Education is the key.

The blog song for today is: " Clouds across the moon" by the RAH Band.

TTFN

Tuesday, 5 April 2022

Alerta sanitaria: éste es el contaminante cancerígeno e inflamatorio que comemos cada día (EL ESPANOL)

La cantidad de microplásticos que atraviesan nuestro tracto gastrointestinal a la semana equivale a una tarjeta de crédito, advierten los expertos. 30 marzo, 2022 02:44

Los microplásticos sus sustancias químicas afines llevan décadas "conviviendo" con el ser humano y con otros animales. Entramos en contacto con ellos al manipular objetos basados en el plástico, pero estas micropartículas omnipresentes también están en el agua y los alimentos, desde donde llegan también al intestino humano.

Según un nuevo estudio publicado en la revista Exposure and Health, a cargo de los investigadores de la Universidad de Medicina de Viena, estaríamos consumiendo mucho más de lo que imaginamos. Según explican, ingeriríamos el equivalente a una "tarjeta de crédito" en forma de microplásticos cada semana.

Según los cálculos de los investigadores, unos cinco gramos de microplásticos pasarían de forma semanal por el tracto gastrointestinal de cada ser humano, una cantidad significativamente elevada. En estudios previos ya se habría sugerido que tanto micro como nanoplásticos son peligrosos para la salud cuando son ingeridos, aunque los efectos adversos a largo plazo aún son poco conocidos.

El foco de la investigación médica actual sobre este tema es precisamente el sistema gastrointestinal, en el cual se pueden detectar microno y nanopartículas (MNP) en el tejido.

En estudios experimentales se ha detectado que las MNP absorbidas a nivel gastrointestinal tienen potencial para cambiar la composición del microbioma intestinal. Estos cambios, a su vez, se habrían relacionado con un mayor riesgo de sufrir enfermedades metabólicas como la obesidad, la diabetes o la enfermedad hepática crónica, según los investigadores.

Así mismo, además de los efectos objetivables sobre el microbioma intestinal, los investigadores también habrían sugerido la existencia de mecanismos moleculares especiales que facilitarían la absorción de MNP en el tejido intestinal.

De hecho, mediante análisis específicos, se habría demostrado que en determinadas condiciones fisicoquímicas los MNP se están absorbiendo cada vez más por parte del tracto gastrointestinal, y esto a su vez provocaría un aumento de la activación de los mecanismos que intervienen en las reacciones inflamatorias e inmunitarias locales. Los nanoplásticos se habrían relacionado con los procesos bioquímicos clave en el desarrollo del cáncer.

Recordemos que un nanoplástico se define como aquella partícula de un tamaño inferior a los 0.001 milímetros, mientras que los microplásticos aún pueden ser visibles, siendo de un tamaño de 0.001 a 5 milímetros.

Tanto micro como nanoplásticos están ya en nuestra cadena alimentaria, dado que son residuos de los envases de plástico usados de forma cotidiana. Además, estas partículas también entran en el sistema gastrointestinal humano mediante la cadena trófica, pues consumimos animales que a su vez han absorbido plásticos.

Por su parte, cabe recordar también que los microplásticos también pueden encontrarse en la bebida: al beber entre 1.5 y 2 litros de agua diarios en botellas de plástico, se llegan a consumir alrededor de 90.000 partículas de plástico anuales según los últimos estudios. Si el agua procede del grifo, la cifra se reduciría a las 40.000 partículas anuales, dependiendo de la ubicación geográfica.

Para rizar el rizo, los investigadores han demostrado una contaminación generalizada del agua mineral con xenohormonas, las cuales se eliminan por lavado de las botellas de tereftalato de polietileno o PET, como ya explicamos en un artículo previo en 'EL ESPAÑOL'. Estas sustancias tienen actividad estrogénica y pueden llegar a tener un efecto cancerígeno en el ser humano.

Para terminar, los investigadores responsables del estudio explican que este consumo de micro y nanoplásticos tendría consecuencias negativas para la salud todavía desconocidas, pero su impacto podría ser mayor en aquellas personas que ya sufren enfermedades crónicas previas. Es más fácil que un intestino enfermo por cualquier otro motivo sea más damnificado que un intestino sano.

Ahora cada dia hay mas noticias malas, pero nosotros sabemos estos para mucho tiempo. Estuvimos gritando al todo el mundo, puedeser ahora les escuchan!

El cancion de hoy esta: "Time" de Pink Floyd

TTFN

 

Friday, 1 April 2022

Recycling Mystery: Headphones, Earbuds, and Chargers - another useful article from Earth911

Recycling Mystery: Headphones, Earbuds, and Chargers

ByJen Thilman

Mar 31, 2022
Man touching earbud in his ear

Headphones, earbuds, and chargers have become essential accessories for many of us. Because we go through so many of these accessories, they can add up to a lot of e-waste that contains plastic, metal, rubber, magnets, wiring, and chemicals. None of these materials are good for the environment — whether they end up in landfills or as litter. They need to be disposed of properly or, better still, recycled.

Electronic waste, or e-waste, is a big problem for our planet. The Global E-waste Statistics Partnership found that of the nearly 7.8 million tons of e-waste generated in the U.S. in 2019, only about 15% was recycled. Recycling electronics is important for many reasons. According to Newtech Recycling, here are some of the biggest reasons why we need to recycle our e-waste:

  • Prevent leaching of toxic materials into the soil and water supply from landfills.
  • Combat rising costs and environmental impacts of new electronics which require rare metals that are expensive to mine and could be recaptured from used electronics.
  • Supports a circular economy — research by the World Economic Forum shows that e-waste is worth over $62 billion annually.
  • Saves energy since using recycled materials uses a lot less, compared to making things from new materials.

Because the life cycle of everything we use needs to be considered, let’s look at the best options for dealing with these electronic accessories when we no longer want them — whether they no longer work, or we’ve simply upgraded.

If Your Accessories Still Work, Donate Them

When upgrading to new electronics, such as the latest smartphone, we often get new accessories with them. Before taking old accessories that still work to an e-waste drop-off, look into giving them away or selling them to someone who will use them.

  • Consider donating working accessories to a local charity or school. It’s a good idea to call first to make sure they can make use of the items you have.

If They Don’t Work, Can They Be Repaired?

When headphones or earbuds don’t work anymore or they work improperly, there is a chance they can be fixed. To save money and the planet, see if you can repair them before you look for ways to recycle them.

Here’s how to find out if these sound accessories can be repaired and how to do it.

Headphones

Here are sites that can guide you through troubleshooting problems with your headphones and how to repair them.

  • Headphonesty has a guide for troubleshooting why your headphones aren’t working correctly and how to fix them.
  • Hooke Audio gives step-by-step instructions on how to repair various issues you may be having with your headphones, from wiring and BlueTooth to sound issues, this site includes videos to walk you through DIY repair.
  • DIY Perks has a YouTube video that walks you through the easy replacement of a headphone jack if the sound is not working correctly.

Earbuds

Earbuds come wireless and with wires. Both are electronic items that have some wiring and chemical components, so it’s important they don’t end up in the trash. These sites tell how you may be able to repair them when they stop working.

  • wikiHow: How To Fix Earbuds
  • xFyro: Earbuds – Guide to Common Problems and Fixes

Chargers

Charging units and cords are not easy to repair. You may be able to extend the life of your cord by taping it with electrical tape when the casing starts to wear out. This helps keep the wires from breaking so they will last longer. If the charging unit no longer charges, your next best option is recycling.

If You Can’t Repair Your Electronics, Recycle

Because the materials in electronics are valuable, the number of recycling, trade-in, and take-back programs is growing. Here are some ways to recycle your e-waste:

  • Original manufacturers often take back used accessories and refurbish them, whether they’re working or not. Visit the website of the brand that made the accessory and search for a recycling or take-back program.

Always make sure to take your e-waste to a recycler that will manage your e-waste responsibly and not ship it to countries that are not equipped to manage it. Look for certification by e-Stewards, for example, which identifies responsible e-waste recyclers.

Repair and Recycle to Preserve Valuable Materials

The growing number of electronics we use translates to a lot of useful materials that should not end up in landfills. Recycling our old electronics reclaims valuable resources that can be used to make new products. In addition to reducing waste, using recycled materials requires less energy and is better for the planet than mining and manufacturing new materials. It’s more important than ever that we repair and recycle all of our electronics and the accessories that go with them.

I have amended the original article because most of the information and links were for the United States.  

As with most electronic stuff, it is difficult to know what to do with it, here on Menorca there are more facilities for disposing of items safely, with more popping up.

At the moment if I am unable to find anywhere I take it to our local recycling plant on the industrial estate in Ciutadella.

The blog song for today is: "Fire and water" by Free

TTFN


 

"Precyclying" - a short explanation from the gang at earth911.com

A report by: Taylor Ratcliffe, he is Earth911's customer support and database manager. He is a graduate of the University of Washington....