Translate

Tuesday, 20 December 2022

Investigation Big oil’s dirty secret in Iraq By Joe Sandler Clarke Published on 29.09.2022 - a report from: https://projects.unearthed.greenpeace.org

 

Investigation

Big oil’s dirty secret in Iraq

Published on 29.09.2022

Ali, who spoke to BBC reporters in Iraq, is 19. He is thin and delicately built. He wears a face mask most of the time when out and about, both to protect his weakened immune system from the ongoing pandemic and to give him some kind of shield from the pollution that surrounds him.

A photograph of Ali in his living room directly looking at the camera. He has big bold eyes, and a slight moustache.
Ali Hussein Juloud in his living room in Rumaila. 
Photo: Jess Kelly / BBC

He has recovered from leukaemia, which he and his family attribute to the pollution from the oil industry they live alongside. The BBC filmed him with friends in Basra, as he showed them photos from his time in hospital.

“That's in Iran, look. This is after the chemo - I lost my eyebrows.”

“Even your eyebrows fell out?” a friend asked.

“Yes.” He flicked to the next picture, then another.

“This was when I played football for Zubair before I got sick. Here I was sick. I was so weak.”

“Look how much you've changed.”

Ali’s home town of Rumaila shares a name with one of the world’s largest oil fields. His neighbourhood is filled with speedily constructed single-storey homes and businesses. Half the area is known locally as “shadow town”, due to the intermittent supply of electricity. The air is often thick with a blend of desert sand and fumes from the nearby oil wells.

Rumaila, the oil field, produces the equivalent of 1.45 million barrels of oil a day (boe/d) — about a third of Iraq’s total oil production — and holds estimated reserves of 17 billion barrels. Driving from one end of the field to the other takes about three hours, excluding time spent waiting at checkpoints guarded by armed militias.

BP became the lead contractor at Rumaila field in 2009. Some oil contracts entitle companies to a percentage of all the money generated by a field. This is not the case in Iraq, where BP is instead paid a fee by the government each year, which BP takes as allocations of oil. BP still makes hundreds of millions of dollars from Rumaila — in 2020 its post-tax profit from the field was $358m.

It boasts on its website of its long history in Iraq and talks of “helping to lay the foundations for long-term success” in the country. What it does not mention is that gas flaring at Rumaila is staggeringly high, despite repeated promises to fix the issue.

What is gas flaring?

In much of the world, gas produced during oil production would be processed and then used for power generation, or reinjected to force more oil out of the ground. But in some places, a lack of infrastructure means this gas has nowhere to go and so is set alight or vented into the atmosphere. In Iraq, a country impoverished by conflict, the vast majority of gas produced during oil production is flared.

On a global scale, flaring is a major source of methane, a superheating greenhouse gas 84 times more potent than carbon dioxide during its first 20 years in the atmosphere. Cutting methane emissions is seen as an effective way to prevent runaway global warming.

President Biden has described stopping methane leaks and flaring as a way of “addressing two problems at once” — hitting global warming and easing the current global energy crisis. Methane is the main component of natural gas, a key energy source.

There is no official, publicly available record of gas flaring at Rumaila. That’s also true for the rest of Iraq’s oil infrastructure.

The World Bank, as part of an effort to track worldwide flaring, uses data from the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which has heat-detecting satellites that measure fires from lit flare stacks. Unearthed analysed the World Bank's figures and cross-checked them with independent organisations.

Rumaila flared 3.39 billion cubic metres (bcm) of gas last year, emitting 9.5 million tonnes of CO2e, according to our analysis of World Bank data.

BP’s share of flaring emissions from Rumaila — based on its participating interest in the field’s operating company of 47.6% — stood at 4.52m tonnes CO2e in 2021. That’s close to double the emissions caused by flaring from the entire UK oil industry the same year. It’s also comparable to the annual emissions of over 970,000 petrol cars.

BP claims to be making progress reducing flaring and has pledged to stop the practice for everything but emergencies by 2030. But Unearthed has learned that the company does not include Rumaila in its annual flaring emissions figures because it classifies Rumaila as a non-operated asset.

While the field is owned by the state-owned Basra Oil Company, until June 2022 the field’s official operator was the Rumaila Operating Organisation (ROO). ROO and BP were closely connected: BP held a 47.6% participating interest in the company and the company counted several current and former BP staffers among its senior team. This summer, a company established and owned by BP and PetroChina, the Basra Energy Company, began to manage the field. Unearthed understands that BP is the primary contact point with the Iraqi state about matters related to the field, and workers at the field told the BBC that BP called the shots at the project.

BP argues that as it is not technically the operator of Rumaila, it does not have to include Rumaila’s emissions in its annual climate impact reports. The company pointed out to Unearthed that this stance is “in line with standard practice across the oil and gas industry” and follows emissions reporting guidelines drawn up by Ipieca, an industry trade body. If it did count Rumaila, BP’s worldwide flaring emissions for 2021 would be doubled.

A BP spokesperson said: “BP does not have any ownership interest in the Rumaila field, or any right to the oil it produces, and has never been its operator. Its flaring and operational data are therefore not included in our reporting.”

Some industry observers argue that the current rules on reporting emissions leave investors with an incomplete picture of a company’s climate impact.

Dominic Watson from the Environmental Defense Fund told Unearthed: “The outdated industry practice of reporting revenue — but not climate pollution — from joint venture assets is no longer acceptable. It’s time that all companies extend their emissions reduction targets, strategies, and reporting to 100% of their production volumes.”

Flaring expert and founder of Capterio Mark Davis said: “Today’s reporting convention — which excludes flaring from ‘non-operated’ assets — limits the visibility into the actual emissions associated with companies, meaning that investors are partly blindsided about the full scale of greenhouse gas impact of their activities.”

BP’s global flaring emission figures for 2021 would double if they included Rumaila

BP’s declared emissions from flaring across its operated assets
4.04 million CO2e
What BP’s emissions would be if they included flaring emissions from Rumaila, based on its stake in the field’s operator
8.56 million CO2e

This investigation also learned, via internal documents and leaked materials, that flaring remains high at Rumaila despite BP signing commitments to limit it.

A leaked internal ROO document obtained by the BBC, signed by a senior BP official, stated that the company would “take account of the need to design an efficient flare system”.

The same document, dated 2013, pledged the firm would take action to minimise flaring and venting and committed to limiting emissions from flaring to less than 10,000 tonnes CO2e a year — many times lower than actual flaring emissions from the field.

Iraq’s oil minister Ihsan Abdul-Jabbar Ismail told the BBC: “We instructed all the contracted companies operating in the oil fields to uphold international standards and reduce methane emissions. The Western companies should respect these standards more than most.”

In a statement, BP said: “Flaring of the gas that is produced alongside oil at Rumaila is a significant challenge that ROO is taking steps to address. Progress has been made in recent years.”

This issue is bigger than BP. There are other fields where, owing to this “non-operated” loophole, international oil companies can earn hundreds of millions of dollars without declaring the related emissions to their shareholders or the wider public.

A small illustration to signify a section break

‘Poisonous gases’

Flaring has been a feature of the Iraqi oil industry for decades but ramped up when foreign companies re-entered the country after the 2003 invasion and began increasing production.

Despite the country's abundant fossil fuel reserves, most Iraqis struggle with power cuts and the country is heavily dependent on neighbouring Iran for electricity generation.

While in southern Iraq, the BBC saw flare stacks at multiple oilfields emitting black smoke. Experts said this indicates inefficient and highly polluting flaring.

With the help of open-source specialists McKenzie Intelligence Services, Unearthed was able to confirm that the facility shown in the video is a gas compression station in north Rumaila. Active flares emitting thick plumes of black smoke can be seen in satellite images at the site on several days in 2022, meaning the scene in the video is by no means a one-off event.

“Instead of burning this gas it could be captured and used to power our homes, like in other countries,” argued Dr Shukri Al-Hassen, an Iraqi environmental scientist.

“Investing in this gas could be worth billions a year to Iraq and would put an end to endless power cuts we experience here, especially in summer when temperatures in Basra exceed 50C.”

International organisations such as the World Bank have invested millions in trying to help Iraq make better use of its gas. The government has committed on several occasions to end “routine flaring” — or flaring in non-emergency circumstances — and has signed up to a World Bank plan to stop the practice, alongside several oil companies, including BP. No progress has been made and today Iraq is the second highest flarer in the world, behind Russia.

For people living near oil fields, flaring creates intense levels of pollution, which locals link to serious health problems, including cancer.

Iraqi law states that oil and gas infrastructure, including flare stacks, can only be established at least 10km from residential areas.

But satellite imagery shows many flare stacks dotted around the town within a 5km range of residential areas.

The proximity of the flares to where people live becomes even more obvious when you look at the area at night and focus on heat sources.

 ‘Nobody speaks out'

Flaring gas produces dangerous chemicals known as volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including benzene, a carcinogen also found in cigarettes.

It’s partly for public health reasons that flaring is restricted in richer parts of the world. Just five days of unplanned flaring at an ExxonMobil-owned chemical plant in Scotland in April 2019 triggered national news coverage and a report by the local NHS health board.

Luay Al-Khateeb, Iraq’s former oil minister, told Unearthed that there is a belief that flaring is linked to health problems in southern Iraq.

“There's a link, definitely. As for the awareness, there's very little. The link is clear. You're talking about poisonous gases being flared in the air,” he said.

“These particles and so on are penetrating our lungs and our bodies… quite frequently when I monitor the local news, it's clear the number of cancer cases in the south are on the rise. The reason for that, I think, is because of the unregulated oil operations.”

Ali, the teenage leukaemia survivor in Rumaila, told the BBC: “We have many leukaemia cases in the area, and deaths. But here in Rumaila, nobody speaks out.”

Dr Shukri al-Hassen, the environmental scientist, said that in Basra and surrounding communities, cancer is so common that it is “like the flu”.

There is a lack of public information on cancer cases in southern Iraq and a near-complete absence of environmental data. Poor diet, high smoking rates, traffic, and even depleted uranium left from munitions from both Gulf wars have all been suggested as possible causes for high cancer rates in southern Iraq, though there is a lack of clear evidence to support these connections. The Iraqi government is understood to be sensitive to any suggestion that pollution caused by flaring could be linked to health problems.

The BBC obtained a confidential report from the Iraqi health ministry that blames pollution from the oil industry, as well as other sources, for a 20% rise in cancer in Basra between 2015 and 2018. The report has never been made public. A second leaked document, seen by the BBC, from the local government in Basra shows that cancer cases in the region are three times higher than figures published in the official nationwide cancer registry.

A small illustration to signify a section break

Fatima

Photograph shows Fatima in hospital. She is propped up in bed and wearing a headscarf. She smiles warmly.
Fatima’s life became dominated by hospital visits as her condition worsened. Photo: Jess Kelly / BBC

Fatima Falah Najem and her family live close to Rumaila on another of Iraq’s large oil fields, Zubair.

Fatima's home is surrounded by flare stacks — some less than 3km away, despite a provision in Iraqi law stating that flare stacks should be a minimum of 10km from residential areas.

Italian oil giant Eni holds a 41% interest in Zubair, according to oil industry analysts. Eni argues that it is technically a contractor for the Iraqi government, rather than a joint owner or operator of the field. The company states that it has no responsibility for flaring at Zubair, which falls on the field’s owner, state oil firm the Basra Oil Company.

The BBC met Fatima in the Basra Cancer Children’s Hospital in the summer of 2021. From her bed, the 13-year-old explained that she had been diagnosed with leukaemia in 2020 and later lost the use of her legs.

Since her diagnosis, her life had been dominated by trips to the hospital. By summer 2021, her condition had deteriorated to the extent that she needed to travel abroad for further care. Many cancer treatments are not available in Iraq, meaning patients have to go to countries like India, Turkey, or Iran.

“Fatima Falah is a star,” her doctor Hossam Mahmood Salih told the BBC. “Right now chemo is no longer enough. She needs a bone marrow transplant. Without this operation, it will be difficult for her to get better. She needs to find a donor and they need to be a 100% match.” He hoped that one of her brothers or sisters would be a suitable match.

Sat on the edge of her bed, Fatima was calm, stoic even, but became quiet as her doctor explained the next phase of her treatment. “You’re responding well, don’t worry. Your news is good,” he reassured her as she fought back tears, then buried her face in his side as he patted her shoulder.

Later, propped up in bed, a sketch pad in front of her, she painted a picture of her family’s home. “These are the fiery flares, we can see them from our farm. Smoke comes off them,” she said.

“I've drawn a bit of the flare. I like to see them. This isn’t too bad. Let me just finish and I'll show you,” she held up her painting, a house complete with bright orange flames in the background.

Photo shows Fatima putting the final touches to the painting og her home. Fatima holds up her painting for the camera.
Fatima shows a painting of her home surrounded by gas flares. Photo: BBC
A small illustration to signify a section break

Pollution monitoring

Frustrated by the lack of publicly available data and determined to get an insight into how ordinary people might be being affected by flaring pollution, the BBC carried out its own pollution monitoring in communities near oil fields in southern Iraq, with advice from independent scientists and the Greenpeace Science Unit. Samples were analysed by independent labs in the UK and Europe.

In January 2022, the BBC placed passive diffusion tubes in 13 locations around Basra in areas between 100 metres and 6km from the nearest gas flare, to sample for VOCs, including benzene, for a period of two weeks. This sampling followed a method approved by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The monitoring found high levels of benzene in all 13 locations, ranging from 2.7 micrograms per metre cubed of air (µg/m3) to 9.7µg/m3. The World Health Organisation states there is no safe level of benzene exposure, while the Iraqi government sets a legal limit of an annual average of 3µg/m3 benzene.

This limit was reached or exceeded by monitoring in four sites near oil fields, including Rumaila, Qurna, and two locations in Nahran Omar.

Urine samples were also taken from 52 Iraqi children living near gas flares at different oil fields in southern Iraq. The decision was made to monitor children because they are less likely than adults to be exposed to other sources of pollution such as smoking or industrial work.

The samples were analysed at a toxicology lab in Belgium for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs). This analysis measured the levels of the chemical 2-Naphthol (2-NAP), which is a metabolite of naphthalene. Naphthalene is released during the burning of fossil fuels.

2-NAP is associated with damaging health effects and is classed as a possible carcinogen. Peer reviewed research — including a study published by Columbia University — suggests that high levels of 2-NAP may lead to health problems including chromosomal aberrations, indicating an increased risk of cancer. In the Columbia paper, high levels were deemed to be those above 5.8µg/m3.

High levels of benzene were found from air pollution across southern Iraq. While urine sampling revealed that many children had high levels of 2-NAP in their bodies.

These sampling efforts represent a snapshot: the air pollution monitoring results are from two weeks of sampling in January, and the figures represent an average of that period. There may have been days where pollution was higher or lower, and pollution levels often change with weather conditions and seasons.

It’s also possible that the sampling picked up benzene from other sources, such as cigarette smoke or passing cars. However, most of the locations chosen were rural and far from busy roads, while the highest levels of benzene were found closest to a flare stack.

It’s likely that at certain times and in certain places around the oil fields, concentrations of benzene are even higher than these results. These measurements were taken in residential areas, ranging from 150m (in Nahran Omar) to 10km, or six miles, away from the nearest flare. Monitoring by regulators in countries like the US usually takes place at the fenceline of the oil and gas facility.

Frank Kelly, an air pollution expert and professor at Imperial College London, told the BBC: “I just look at the benzene data and we're seeing values from 1.3 up to 9.6µg/m³ and immediately that causes some worry to me. The World Health Organisation has said that there is no safe level of benzene, no safe level at all.”

Kelly noted that “longer term exposure has been linked to the development of certain cancers, such as acute myeloid leukaemia”. He warned that long-term exposure to pollution at this level would be extremely damaging to children’s health and called for more monitoring, describing the BBC’s work as “strong pilot data”.

Manuela Orjuela-Grimm, assistant professor of epidemiology and paediatrics at Columbia University in New York, who led the research on the previously mentioned study, also said the urine sampling should be used as a starting point for more monitoring.

“The children have strikingly high levels of metabolites of PAHs in their urine. That’s certainly concerning for their own health and suggests that they should be monitored.”

When questioned over these findings by the BBC, Iraq’s oil minister, Ihsan Abdul-Jabbar Ismail, claimed levels of benzene were high “because of the types of engines in cars” in southern Iraq.

He added: "Yes, the use of hydrocarbons is part of the problem, because we have more than seven million cars but it does not constitute the largest part.”

The minister also said that in 2017, Basra’s health department was commissioned by an unidentified Iraqi oil company to look at the reasons for the increase in cancer in some areas in Basra. This report “concluded that oil extraction has nothing to do with the increase in cancer rates”, he said. The oil ministry refused the BBC’s request to see the report.

Asked about benzene levels at Rumaila specifically, Ismail said: “BP is responsible for all environmental and health measures in this field. We will request a report on this subject to confirm the percentage of benzene.

“If this really poses a risk, then BP, the British oil company, is responsible for managing this issue, and I will investigate the matter.”

In response to these findings, a spokesperson for BP said: “We are extremely concerned by the issues raised by the BBC — we will immediately review those concerns and work with our partners on any necessary interventions. We are fully committed to supporting further improvements at this vitally important field for Iraq.”

A spokesperson for Eni said: “Eni monitors its activities in line with best practices, and continues to be a major investor in wider healthcare system improvement across Iraq. Eni strongly rejects the links that you are making between its responsibilities as a contractor in the work you are doing to assess the impact of flaring on human health.”

The spokesperson added that Eni conducts its own air testing “related to its strict area of operations”; its most recent survey, in November 2021, recorded levels “within acceptable ranges”.

A small illustration to signify a section break

Hidden emissions

At Zubair, where Fatima and her family live, last year, 2.61 billion cubic metres of gas was flared, according to our analysis, leading to emissions of 7.31m tonnes CO2e, a significant rise on the previous year.

If you took Eni’s 41% interest in Zubair to mean it is accountable for 41% of the field’s emissions, its share of flaring emissions from the field would stand at 3m tonnes CO2e in 2021.

Like BP, Eni counts its Iraqi asset as non-operated, meaning it is excluded from the company’s annual climate reports showing flaring emissions.

Eni’s self-declared flaring emissions for 2021 for all its operations worldwide stood at 7.14m tonnes CO2e. That means that if Eni had included Zubair in its final flaring figures, the company’s annual emissions from flaring would have increased by over 40%, according to our analysis.

Eni has boasted in the past about its efforts to “improve the use of associate gas” at its project in Iraq.

In response to this story, Eni stated that as it is not the operator of Zubair and has no responsibility for the high levels of flaring at the field. A company spokesperson said: “Eni’s declared flaring figure does not include emissions from Zubair, according with international accounting rules and in line with technical service agreement. Responsibility for flaring is assigned to BOC (Basra Oil Company).”

Eni, BP and the Iraqi government are all signed up to an initiative by the World Bank to eliminate routine flaring by 2030, an effort to address climate change and “advance the sustainable development of producing countries”.

In BP's latest submission to the initiative, the company stated that just 3% of its flaring in 2020 was routine, a number that would be blown out of the water if Rumaila — where virtually all flaring is routine — was included.

A spokesperson from the World Bank acknowledged that its Zero Routine Flaring commitment does not include non-operated gas flaring. A statement from the organisation read: “All parties involved in oil production are encouraged to use their expertise and resources to eliminate routine flaring at all sites, whether or not they operate those sites”. The organisation also acknowledged that contractual arrangements may mean that companies do not have direct control or rights over associated gas at some fields.

BP has committed to reach net zero emissions by 2050. As part of that it has pledged to eliminate routine flaring by 2030 and install methane monitoring “at all existing major oil and gas processing sites by 2023, publish the data and then drive a 50% reduction in methane intensity of our operations”. The company’s work in Iraq is not included in these commitments.

Mark Davis from Capterio said: “Investors are increasingly realising that companies should be striving for the same reporting and operational standards across all their assets, and should be promoting greater transparency.”

Companies signed up to the UN-backed Oil and Gas Methane Partnership (OGMP), which includes BP, will have to report non-operated flaring by 2025. Unearthed has learned that Rumaila will not be included in this disclosure.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shell in Oman

It is not uncommon for major oil companies to partner with firms owned by national governments. Shell has a 34% stake in Petroleum Development Oman (PDO), which is owned by the Omani government. Last year, PDO fields in Oman flared 1.15bcm of gas, leading to 3.22m tonnes CO2e.

Shell’s flaring across all its operated assets worldwide led to emissions of 4.5m tonnes CO2e last year. If a share of PDO’s flaring equivalent to Shell’s stake were included in its numbers, its flaring numbers would increase by 24%.

Unlike some of its rivals, Shell does record emissions from non-operated assets in its climate reporting, Unearthed understands, but only as a total figure showing scope 1 and 2 emissions from for all its non-operated assets worldwide. It provides no detail on which emissions come from flaring or from other types of activities, and offers no information about where in the world the emissions were released.

Dominic Watson from the Environmental Defense Fund, an organisation that has published research on emissions reporting, said: “Methane emissions and flaring from non-operated joint ventures are an enormous climate shortcoming across the global oil and gas industry, as over half of supermajor oil and gas production stems from non-operated assets, many of which are run by state-owned enterprises.”

He added that oil majors had “largely failed in both convincing many of their joint venture partners that methane and flaring are critical climate and business issues to be addressed, and equipping them with the technical and financial resources to address this challenge.”

A small illustration to signify a section break

A giant methane plume

In 2011, Shell struck a deal with the Iraqi government to collect gas from Rumaila, Zubair, and West Qurna 1. The company formed a joint venture — alongside Japanese firm Mitsubishi and an Iraqi company — called the Basra Gas Company (BGC). BGC was supposed to revolutionise the Iraqi oil industry, but the firm has struggled and flaring has remained high.

On 27 and 28 October 2020, a giant plume of methane measuring 120 tonnes an hour was detected emanating from a gas compression facility run by BGC.

To put that in context, if that level of emission continued for a year, the methane coming from that single facility would be equivalent to about half of all anthropogenic methane emissions from the UK.

The discovery was made by scientists at the SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, using cutting-edge satellite technology, and shared with Unearthed and the BBC.

The plume was not the only one SRON spotted, though it was the largest. In 2020 and 2021, the scientists spotted eight further “super-emissions”, measuring at least five tonnes per hour — even though efforts to detect emissions were hampered by the thick black smoke from flaring that coats much of southern Iraq.

“The methane is just pouring out and that’s incredible,” said Ilse Aben, a senior scientist at SRON, discussing the October emission. “Particularly because these emissions are avoidable.”

A spokesperson for Shell, referring to the major plume in October 2020, said the company “believes that the operator, BGC, is aware of the issue with its venting flare system and is deploying operating controls to reduce methane emissions… Its business plans include other projects focused on flare system upgrades and repairs to further reduce venting and fugitive emissions.”

They argued that the emission in October 2020 was exceptional and that new technology, such as infrared cameras to alert the company of methane leaks, was being installed to prevent such incidents in future.

A small illustration to signify a section break

‘What is the solution? What can we do?’

Fatima’s father, Hasan, holding hands with one of his daughters, looks out at flare stacks near his family’s home.
Hasan, Fatima’s father, seen here with one his daughters, has seen the area around his farm become ever more dominated by the oil industry. Photo: BBC

Fatima died on 8 November 2021.

“Whenever we asked her what she wanted, she said she just wanted to get better,” her mother, Iman, told the BBC. “Every time I look at her pictures I cry.

“She spent her last moments in the ICU. That’s where she died. They took her there in the evening and I was the only one who stayed with her in the room.”

Iman continued: “I was hugging her and then I saw that her heart monitor had stopped. It dropped off and her heart stopped.

“She told the doctor she had pain in her heart, he comforted her and told her not to worry. I wanted to turn her on her side but she said her heart hurt and she could only lie on her back. Somebody came and helped her pray to ease the pain."

Fatima’s mother and father, Hasan, looked drained by grief; her siblings forlorn and prematurely aged. Their home is filled with her belongings: her toys, drawings, and clothes, including those that she was wearing when she died.

Later the family learned from monitoring carried out by the BBC that high levels of 2-NAP were found in the urine of children living in Zubair.

Again, the results are a snapshot. Levels may change day by day. The only way to know more is to do more monitoring. High levels of 2-NAP in childhood means an increased risk of health problems — such as forms of cancer — later in life, but such outcomes are not certain.

“What is the solution?” asked Hasan, when he saw the results. “What can we do? We are aware, we all know that the smoke and oil is harmful but what is the solution?”

A small illustration to signify a section break

‘What have the Iraqi people got out of oil?’

Iraq is one of the world’s most vulnerable countries to climate change.

Temperatures in Basra and other cities now regularly approach 50C in the summer. Water scarcity and the loss of farmland to desertification are real concerns. Diversifying the economy is another challenge — 99% of the country’s export revenue came from oil in the last decade.

Azzam Alwash is the climate and environment adviser to Barham Salih, Iraq's president. He claims that he is one of just a handful of people in government who understand the risks of climate change.

“The flaring has increased because we don't have the capacity to capture the associated gas. I've been told that we're burning something like $100m worth of gas every day,” he said.

“What have the Iraqi people got out of oil? They've got a war with Iran, years of sanctions, more war, instability... we haven’t got shit from oil. In 1960, our economy was the same size as South Korea. Look at South Korea today and look at Iraq, and South Korea does not have a drop of oil.”

Iraqi law suggests that those affected by pollution from flaring could be entitled to compensation. Air quality legislation passed in 2012 states: “the owner of a source of emissions causing pollution to ambient air conditions shall bear the cost of damages to the environment and health or costs of removing the pollution source and compensating the aggrieved, if it was proved that pollution emitted from the source exceeded specifications.”

People the BBC spoke with in Rumaila and Zubair said they had never received an offer of compensation from oil companies for the health problems they believe are due to the oil operations they live alongside.

“After I recovered I tried many times to get the companies to compensate me due to the fact I got sick because of the oil,” Ali told the BBC. “My father went to BP, but unfortunately I never got a response.”

Responding to this, BP informed Unearthed that the Rumaila Operating Organisation has long-standing procedures in place to receive and manage concerns or complaints from communities. BP also highlighted ROO’s work with the local community, which includes road building and the funding of community health clinics.

Eni rejected the suggestion that it might be liable to pay compensation to people who feel they have been affected by gas flaring from Zubair. A spokesperson said the terms of the company’s contract in Iraq “explicitly state that we do not have control of the strategy for the field, or the responsibility for flaring, flaring reduction projects or community compensation, all of which sit with BOC.”

The company is aiming to improve Iraq’s health system, the spokesperson added, including investing $32m in cancer diagnostics in Basra and separate support for the Basra Cancer Children’s Hospital.

Back in Rumaila, Ali likes to spend his free time gardening. He’s been able to grow a palm tree in his backyard. He hopes to grow a white mulberry tree too.

He runs his own shop in town, which has become a hang-out spot for local kids. He’s made a life for himself, even if he feels stuck in Rumaila. His illness interrupted his education at a crucial stage.

His younger nephew Abbas follows him everywhere, accompanying him when he travels around his hometown on his moped.

“I’ve parked here to look at this view that we’ve got so used to,” he pointed out the flare stacks as he filmed on his phone. “These are the houses of Rumaila. Look at all the smoke and the gases. It’s all coming towards our neighbourhood.”

“I hope in the future that these companies go away,” he said later. “That the emissions stop, so children can live in peace.

 Thought provoking report wouldn't you say?  There is always more than meets the eye to any of these wars and problems that are happening in the middle east.  Unfortunately,money seems to be always at the bottom of it.  Those people are being shafted by their own government and the big oil companies, but then again that could be said for the rest of the world too.

The blog song for today is: "Tell all the people" by the Doors

TTFN

Thursday, 15 December 2022

Las especies se extinguen y la humanidad colapsa - de: https://www.excelsior.com

 

Las especies se extinguen y la humanidad colapsa

Lorena Rivera Lorena Rivera

La pérdida de biodiversidad en el mundo es un riesgo sistémico como resultado de la desordenada actividad humana a lo largo de las eras, acentuada a partir de la Revolución Industrial, pero, de unas décadas para acá, se ha acelerado de manera alarmante.

El que la vida de múltiples especies vaya muriendo significa un riesgo para las sociedades humanas.

Pero, ¿qué es pérdida de biodiversidad? La literatura especializada la describe como la disminución de la diversidad genética o el colapso de ecosistemas enteros.

Se calcula que un millón, de los ocho millones de especies animales, fúngicas y vegetales que existen en el planeta está en peligro de extinción; además, tres cuartas partes de la superficie terrestre y 66% de los océanos se han alterado significativamente, de acuerdo con el informe sobre el estado de la biodiversidad publicado en 2019 por la Plataforma Intergubernamental Científico-Normativa sobre Diversidad Biológica y Servicios de los Ecosistemas (IBPES, por sus siglas en inglés). Eso no es todo, cada diez minutos desaparece una especie.

Otro estudio que da cuenta del acelerado declive de las especies silvestres es el Informe Planeta Vivo 2022 del Fondo del Fondo Mundial para la Naturaleza (WWF, por sus siglas en inglés), presentado en octubre pasado, el cual alertó que las poblaciones estudiadas de mamíferos, aves, anfibios, reptiles y peces han disminuido, en promedio, 69% desde 1970.

Por desgracia, América Latina es la región del mundo que ha experimentado la mayor disminución regional en la abundancia promedio de la población de vida silvestre con 94%, mientras que las poblaciones de especies de agua dulce han sufrido la mayor disminución global, ésta de 83 por ciento.

Las cifras son frías e incontrovertibles.

Un dato que no debe minimizarse es que los polinizadores, como insectos, llámense abejas, mariposas, escarabajos, avispas y hormigas, entre otros, son responsables de más de dos tercios de todos los cultivos del mundo. Es decir, el suministro de alimentos depende de ellos, pero las poblaciones de estos polinizadores están cayendo y algunas especies están en peligro de extinción, por lo tanto, la seguridad alimentaria está en la cuerda floja.

Los científicos alertan que la pérdida de especies de todos los reinos y ecosistemas completos es potenciadora de problemas complejos, como migraciones, hambrunas, aumento de la injusticia social, enfermedades zoonóticas y pandemias, violación de los derechos humanos, condiciones de trabajo precarias, consumo irresponsable y escasez de medicamentos, entre otros.

Otro dato: el Foro Económico Mundial indica que más de la mitad del PIB global está en riesgo por la pérdida de la naturaleza y una mayor devastación de los ecosistemas aumenta el peligro de futuras crisis socioeconómicas, como pandemias. Además, 25% de los medicamentos utilizados en la medicina proceden de las plantas de la selva tropical.

La crisis profunda de pérdida de biodiversidad galopa de la mano de la crisis climática, también ocasionada por las actividades humanas y la quema de combustibles fósiles.

¿Por qué? Porque el cambio climático está colapsando ecosistemas como el Ártico, donde el deshielo ha puesto al oso polar en peligro de extinción o la muerte de arrecifes de coral por el calentamiento de los océanos, que son ecosistemas importantísimos para la vida marina, pues ahí viven e interactúan diversas especies de peces, caracoles, erizos, estrellas de mar, langostas, algas y pastos marinos.

Recordemos que los océanos son, en sí mismos, enormes ecosistemas y de ellos depende la subsistencia de millones de personas, pero el cambio climático, la pesca ilegal, la sobrepesca y la basura plástica son sus principales enemigos.

Naciones Unidas y organizaciones enfocadas en el cuidado del ambiente han advertido sobre la importancia de conservar la biodiversidad, porque es fundamental para la humanidad por su estrecho vínculo con el desarrollo social y económico, la salud y el bienestar, además de ser un “componente clave” para lograr los 17 Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible.

Mañana inicia en Montreal, Canadá, la Conferencia sobre Diversidad Biológica de la ONU conocida como la COP15, cuya meta es detener y revertir la pérdida de biodiversidad hacia 2030; para lograrlo se reunirán los representantes de los gobiernos de los países para acordar un nuevo conjunto de objetivos durante la próxima década a través del proceso marco posterior a 2020 del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica.

Asimismo, la expectativa es restaurar bosques y manglares, entre otros ecosistemas, pues almacenan enormes cantidades de carbono y son fundamentales para equilibrar el clima global.

De esta COP15 deben surgir soluciones realistas que involucren a todos para proteger mejor la naturaleza, porque aún no se ha logrado cumplir las metas establecidas en reuniones anteriores.

Al momento de escribir este artículo, la población global era de ocho mil tres millones 800 mil 909 personas (y contando), así que lo que hagan o dejen de hacer los gobiernos definirá el destino de la diversidad de vida de la Tierra, y el de la humanidad también.

Estamos gritando al resto del mundo, HACER ALGO POR FAVOR, pero nada.

Que lastima para nosotros y nuestra nietos.

El canción del blog esta:  "My way" de los Sex Pistols

TTFN

Wednesday, 14 December 2022

First UK coal mine in decades approved despite climate concerns- A report from https://www.bbc.com


First UK coal mine in decades approved despite climate concerns

Artist's impression 
Image source, West Cumbria Mining Company
Image caption,
The mine would be near Whitehaven in Cumbria

Michael Gove has approved the first new UK coal mine in 30 years despite concern about its climate impacts among Conservative MPs and experts.

The proposed mine in Cumbria would dig up coking coal for steel production in the UK and across the world.

Critics say the mine would undermine climate targets and demand for coking coal is declining.

But supporters claim the mine, near Whitehaven, will create jobs and reduce the need to import coal.

The fate of the West Cumbria Mining project had been hanging in the balance for two years after the local county council initially approved the mine in 2020.

The project's approval was suspended in early 2021, ahead of the COP26 climate conference in Glasgow, after the government's climate change adviser said it would increase carbon emissions.

The government's advisory Climate Change Committee (UKCCC) pointed out that 85% of the coal produced by the mine would be exported.

'European market'

Lord Deben, chairman of the CCC, described the proposal as "absolutely indefensible" and said its approval would damage the UK's leadership on climate change.

  • Whitehaven - an almighty row only just beginning
  • Would a new coal mine threaten the UK's climate goals?
  • Coal mine plan indefensible, UK climate chief says
  • The environmental case for buying a coal mine

Planning authorities reviewed the original decision and sent a report to the secretary of state of communities to review and make a final judgement.

A letter outlining the decision said Mr Gove - the communities and levelling-up secretary - agreed with the planning inspector's recommendation to approve the mine.

The letter says Mr Gove was "satisfied that there is currently a UK and European market for the coal".

The secretary of state agrees with the assessment that the effects of the development on carbon emissions "would be relatively neutral and not significant", the letter says.

The department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities said the decision was consistent with the government's policies on curbing carbon emissions.

But opposition parties and environmental groups condemned the decision as harmful for the climate and the UK's transition to a greener economy.

Friends of the Earth said the decision was a "misguided and deeply damaging mistake that flies in the face of all the evidence".

"The mine isn't needed, will add to global climate emissions, and won't replace Russian coal," said Friends of the Earth campaigner Tony Bosworth.

Low carbon steel

Coal is the dirtiest of all fossil fuels, producing almost twice the emissions of natural gas.

West Cumbria Mining says the coking coal it produces will be used for steelmaking in the UK and Europe.

The local council had granted permission to dig for coking coal until 2049, with the mine expected to create about 500 jobs.

But the two companies that still make steel using coal in the UK - British Steel and Tata - say they plan to move to lower carbon production methods.

Steel industry expert Chris McDonald estimates that, at best, they will use less than 10% of the output of the mine and, by the mid-2030s, none at all.

That means the new mine will export virtually all the coal it produces.

Whitehaven mine site 
Image source, Getty Images
Image caption,
The former Marchon chemical works on the outskirts of Whitehaven is the site of the proposed mine

Shadow climate secretary Ed Miliband said the mine was "no solution to the energy crisis" and "does not offer secure, long-term jobs".

The Green Party suggested the decision had been "cynically delayed" until after the UK's presidency of COP ended and had left the government's environmental credentials "in tatters".

The decision could expose divisions within the Conservative Party, whose greener MPs have spoken out against the plans.

Senior Conservatives - including the former chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng and COP President Alok Sharma - had argued the mine would conflict with the UK's climate targets.

But some Northern Tory MPs had campaigned for the mine on the basis it would provide jobs and investment.

In a tweet, former Conservative Party chairman Jake Berry said the decision was "good news for the North and for common sense".

line
Analysis box by Ione Wells, political correspondent

Where does this leave Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's green credentials?

Only earlier this week he caved to pressure from his own Tory MPs to relax planning rules for new onshore wind farms in England, having previously wanted to keep the de facto ban on them.

Critics argue burning more coal is the antithesis of such plans to boost green energy sources.

Supporters of the mine say it would support the government's pledge to level up and reduce regional inequality.

But Labour say that doesn't have to conflict with net zero commitments - arguing the government should invest in jobs in renewable energy, insulation and nuclear power instead.

line

The mine has also divided opinion in Cumbria, with some in favour of the jobs it would bring, but others warning of the risks of climate change.

Chris Whiteside, a local Conservative councillor, welcomed the decision, saying that UK coking coal was "less damaging to the planet than importing coal from USA or Russia".

But ahead of the decision, South Lakes Action on Climate Change - a Cumbria campaign group that opposes the mine - suggested the project epitomised the UK's "lack of meaningful action on the climate and ecological emergency".

This is a huge blow to someone like me, we have been trying for years to get governments to stop using fossil fuels, and what does the UK lot go and do? It looks like because they have left the EU they are sticking two fingers up at the rest of Europe and the world.  I find this decision awful and worrying.  I am at a loss to understand the logic behind this. 

The blog song for today is "F**k You"by Lily Allen

TTFN

Friday, 9 December 2022

Whatever Happened to Plastic-Free? - an earth 911.com report

 

Whatever Happened to Plastic-Free?

ByGemma Alexander

Dec 5, 2022 ,
Waste bin full of single-use plastic trash

In the 20-teens, the plastic-free lifestyle was getting almost as much attention as the Whip Nae Nae. But blogs and articles featuring smiling urbanites with tiny jars containing a year’s worth of plastic waste seem to have disappeared. Was plastic-free just another pop culture fad? Did plastic win? Whatever happened to plastic-free?

This article contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through one of these links, we receive a small commission that helps fund our Recycling Directory.

Plastic Pollution

Unlike many trends from the decade that left no lasting impression, plastic-free living was an attempt to do something important. Plastic is a key player in two of the biggest environmental crises facing the world today: climate change and global pollution. Plastic is responsible for between 4% and 8% of global oil consumption. Plastics production in the U.S. generates 232 million metric tons of greenhouse gases every year. Plastic products are often used only once and then discarded. Plastics incineration in the U.S. accounts for 5.9 million metric tons of CO2-eq, primarily in areas near impoverished communities and communities of color. Outside of the U.S., plastic is often burned in the open, where it releases poisonous chemicals with a global warming potential 5,000 times higher than carbon.

Eight million tons of plastic makes its way to marine ecosystems each year, where it forms massive garbage gyres and wreaks environmental havoc. Plastic does not biodegrade, but sunlight and heat do cause it to release greenhouse gases as it breaks down into microscopic particles that enter the food chain and bioaccumulate. The average person ingests about 5 grams of microplastics per week (about as much plastic as a credit card) through food, water, and even the air we breathe. No one knows what the long-term impacts on human health will be from ingesting so much plastic.

Plastic-Free

Clearly, we need to work towards a post-plastic world. And in the teens, it seemed like people were starting to do it. Beth Terry is credited with starting the Plastic-Free movement. Inspired by a photo of a sea bird killed by eating plastic, Terry set out to eliminate her personal plastic use. She documented her progress on the blog, My Plastic Free Life. In 2012, she published the book Plastic-Free: How I Kicked the Plastic Habit and How You Can Too and updated it in 2015 – the same year she gave an interview to Earth911.

Cover of Plastic Free by Beth Terry

Unlike the fairly simple switch of sorting recycling, going plastic-free requires lifestyle changes both big and small. Even so, many serious environmentalists were inspired by Terry’s project and took on the challenge themselves. Earth911 profiled people living plastic-free in 2016; The New York Times published a story featuring several more in 2019. Like Terry, many of them kept blogs. But a search for “plastic free life” today brings up Terry’s website (which was last updated in 2019) and not much else. What happened?

Plastic-Free July

It may not be surprising that the movement didn’t gain widespread popularity. Despite some gains in plastic-free packaging, and even retailers specializing in plastic-free products, for many people, plastic-free living simply isn’t realistic. If you need to take medicine, your prescription will come in plastic; if you have children, you will inevitably accumulate some plastic toys.

But that doesn’t mean that people have given in to the ever-growing wave of plastic. Founded in 2011, the Plastic Free Foundation in Australia created the Plastic Free July challenge. As a month-long challenge that focuses on single-use plastics, Plastic Free July is more achievable than a total lifestyle change. Encouraging a good, better, best approach, the point of the challenge is not perfection but improvement. Because changes made for a month are likely to stick, completing a Plastic Free challenge is a good way to reduce your overall plastic waste year-round. Plastic Free: The Inspiring Story of a Global Environmental Movement and Why It Matters relates the history of the challenge and shares lessons from its success.

Cover of Plastic Free by Rebecca Prince-Ruiz

Zero Waste

But for environmentalists who are serious about eliminating plastic, there are still some resources. Plastic waste – especially the waste that ends up polluting waterways – is predominantly packaging waste. So efforts to eliminate plastic waste overlap almost perfectly with the Zero Waste movement. Zero Waste doesn’t necessarily mean “zero garbage.” But it does seek to eliminate the wastefulness that leads to large amounts of garbage – especially plastic waste.

Cover of Zero Waste by Shia Su

Today there are many websites like Zero Waste Memoirs and books like Shia Su’s Zero Waste: Simple Life Hacks to Drastically Reduce Your Trash that provide the same kind of personal journey stories combined with practical tips that plastic-free websites once did. Many of them refer to Kathryn Kellogg’s website Going Zero Waste and book 101 Ways to Go Zero Waste as their own inspiration.

Cover of 101 Ways To Go Zero Waste by Kathryn Kellogg

Whether you frame your goal as plastic-free or zero waste in the ‘20s really isn’t very important. What does matter is reducing your plastic consumption wherever you can. Start with simple changes like finding alternatives for the single-use plastics that you use the most.

 As always a great report.  I really like this website because it gives out good ideas and advice. 

The blog song for today is: "Save me" by Queen

TTFN

Thursday, 1 December 2022

Indonesia’s last tiger: A very sad report from https://www.fauna-flora.org

A very sad report from https://www.fauna-flora.org/species/sumatran-tiger/

Indonesia’s last tiger

Sadly, fewer than 400 Sumatran tigers are estimated to remain in the wild. This subspecies is listed as Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species due to poaching, habitat loss and human-wildlife conflict. Kerinci Seblat National Park and the Ulu Masen and Leuser ecosystems of Aceh on the Indonesian island of Sumatra are global priority areas for tiger conservation.

Sumatran tiger facts

  • Sumatran tigers are the smallest of all tiger subspecies and in captivity can weigh up to 140kg
  • They have a more bearded and maned appearance than other subspecies
  • Sumatran tigers hunt wild pigs and deer but will take other prey opportunistically
  • They are generally very shy and try to avoid people
  • Sumatran tigers were previously known as Panthera tigris sumatrae but in 2017 the IUCN Cat Specialist Group revised tiger taxonomy, recognising just two tiger subspecies: Panthera tigris sondaica, comprising the Sumatran and (now extinct) Javan and Balinese populations, and Panthera tigris tigris, comprising the Bengal, Malayan, Indochinese, South Chinese, Siberian and (extinct) Caspian tiger populations

Critically Endangered Critically Endangered
Indonesia Indonesia

Family:

Felidae

Order:

Carnivora

Est. in the wild:

Approx. 400

Conservation story

One of the main threats to Sumatran tigers is poaching. Hunters trap or shoot them for their skin, bones and canines, which are in high demand as status symbols, primarily overseas, and for use in East Asian traditional medicine. A reduction in prey availability due to deer poaching, as well as habitat loss due to expansion of oil palm, coffee and acacia plantations, and smallholder encroachment, also threaten these big cats.

Fauna & Flora International (FFI) is conserving tigers and other threatened wildlife such as clouded leopards and Asian elephants in three Sumatran landscapes: Aceh, Riau and Kerinci Seblat National Park. In combination, these forests contain more than 60% of all wild Sumatran tigers. Success here is therefore critical for the tiger’s long-term survival.

Kerinci Seblat National Park was one of the few protected areas in Asia where, park-wide, tiger encounter records stabilised during 2007 – 2011 and began to increase. This was due to the improved protection afforded by FFI and partners through the Tiger Protection & Conservation Units. Sadly, in 2013 – 2015 a major spike in poaching threat was recorded, driven by organised illegal wildlife trade syndicates. This threat has now dramatically reduced following targeted, intelligence-led law enforcement, paving the way for recovery.

How FFI is helping to save the Sumatran tiger

To conserve tigers, FFI applies its tried and tested best practice strategies through:

Supporting robust law enforcement

We have worked closely with national park and other forestry agencies to provide training for more than 500 dedicated forest rangers who conduct anti-poaching forest patrols, removing snares and deterring forest crime while engaging positively with the community.

This work is supported by a carefully cultivated network of local community supporters, whose information often plays a key role in guiding patrols to tackle active poaching and providing information that supports undercover investigations to identify tiger poachers and traders. Teams then work with the relevant authorities to support law enforcement and prosecution of poachers and traders. We have also set up local networks for recording and reporting illegal logging.

Human-tiger conflict mitigation 

Tigers, especially young transients looking to establish their own home range, occasionally wander out of the forest and into farmland. Usually the tiger simply passes through and safely returns back to the forest, but sometimes it will take a cow or a dog or – very rarely – attack a person.

To address local concerns and prevent retaliatory killing of real or perceived ‘problem tigers’, swift responses from conservation teams are needed. We have established rapid response units that react quickly to reports of human-tiger conflict and have prevented many unnecessary killings and captures of wild tigers.

Occasionally, tigers may be caught in snare traps, set by farmers for crop-raiding wild pigs. In these cases, we rapidly mobilise veterinary support to care for the tiger, with a primary aim of releasing a fully recovered animal back into the wild.

Population monitoring

To assess the impact of the conservation work we carry out with our partners, we set remotely activated camera traps in the forest to monitor tiger population trends – this monitoring supports and informs protection and conservation strategies.

Conservation coalition

In early 2022, to coincide with the latest Year of the Tiger, FFI joined forces with five other leading conservation organisations that have worked collaboratively for decades to conserve the world’s tigers. The six-strong group, which comprises FFI, International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Panthera, TRAFFIC, Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) and World Wildlife Fund (WWF), has united under a shared vision: Securing a Viable Future for the Tiger.

Tigers have been wiped out from most of Indonesia, with only the Sumatran population remaining.

1976

Date of the last official record of a tiger on Java. The Bali tiger disappeared even earlier – probably in the 1940s.

Unique

Each tiger’s pattern of stripes is completely unique to that individual.

“Between 2012 and 2015, after years of declining threat, tigers in Kerinci Seblat were the focus of a surge in illegal wildlife trade-driven poaching. We responded by strengthening information networks to support patrol deployment while working to identify the poachers and traders driving the threat and to support law enforcement.

Since January 2016, 29 tiger poachers and traders have been arrested, prosecuted and jailed, and we have seen dramatic falls in poaching threat across the landscape, wildlife trade networks disrupted and the scene set for a return to population increase.”
Debbie Martyr Kerinci Tiger Programme, Technical Advisor
 
As usual, if there was no rich people from wherever buying there would be no need to supply.  The end users of these products need to be prosecuted along with the poachers and dealers in this disgusting trade.
 
Unfortunately, none of the governments of the countries affected seem to be winning the battle. Corruption is everywhere and some people turn a blind eye to it all, and as a result species are disappearing.
How terribly sad and upsetting.  Imagine showing a picture of a tiger to a child and they have no idea what they are.
The blog song for today is:  "Up the junction" by Squeeze
TTFN 

Friday, 25 November 2022

IKEA Starts Selling Solar Panels- a report from: https://earth911.com

IKEA Starts Selling Solar Panels

ByGemma Alexander

Nov 16, 2022 home solar system, IKEA
IKEA solar concept: Swedish flag and solar panels

For some people, IKEA is synonymous with difficult-to-assemble but affordable furniture. For others, the global brand brings to mind strolling through endless showrooms filled with home furnishing displays — or stopping at the onsite restaurant for its popular Swedish meatballs. But for most people, the IKEA brand hasn’t been associated with home solar solutions — until recently. In May 2022, the company announced that it is teaming up with a leading solar provider to make solar energy easier to access. This fall, IKEA home solar launched in the U.S. in select California markets.

The move is a good one for IKEA as it strives to reinforce its image as a company that cares about the environment because renewable energy still provides only one-fifth of the electricity in the United States. We still rely on fossil fuels for 60% of our electricity. As long as the country fails to tap into the potential of offshore wind farms, the burden of installing renewable energy falls to individuals. Powering your home with solar energy is more feasible than you might think. But sometimes it feels like you need to be an engineer to figure out how solar energy works.

Solar

Installing solar panels can lower or eliminate your electricity bills, reduce your reliance on fossil fuels, and benefit the environment. 

It is a myth that you have to live in a sunny region to make use of solar energy – you can see how many others in your state have already done it. Solar panels work best in direct sunlight (but not extreme heat), but they still function in cloudy weather or indirect sunlight. In Finland, with only two hours of sunlight in the winter, solar panels can now pay for themselves in under a decade.

While solar electrical systems can work in any climate, not every home is suitable for solar panels. The orientation of the roof and available space may affect efficiency. Mature trees that shade a home may be worth saving. If your home is not suitable for a solar panel system, community solar might be your best option for renewable energy.

Although most solar panel systems will pay for themselves in time, the upfront cost can be a significant barrier. Fortunately, there are ways to overcome this barrier, through solar tax credits and other financing resources.

Choosing a solar company can be confusing. From a single provider supplying DIYers in 1978, the solar industry has expanded to more than 13,000 installation companies across the U.S. today. Whether they are local or national, these companies are rarely household names. Because each solar installation is basically a custom job, it can be difficult to compare solar proposals.

IKEA

IKEA store showroom
Founded in Sweden, IKEA’s stores are now found around 
the world. By bringing home solar solutions to U.S. stores, 
IKEA could make switching to solar more accessible to 
many Americans. 
Photo: Anton Ivanov Photo – stock.adobe.com

IKEA is the go-to home store for people who are new at adulting or on a tight budget. Like any large retailer, it has a big environmental footprint. IKEA products are infamously disposable. Its products’ particle board and laminate construction doesn’t always hold up to extended daily use, and recycling is not an option. In the past, IKEA has struggled with high formaldehyde levels in its glues and lacquers and child labor in its Asian textile manufacturing facilities. The company continues to face political and financial criticism.

Despite these issues, IKEA is generally considered a good example of corporate sustainability. It has discontinued sales of single-use items, it recycles mattresses, and it recently introduced a furniture buy-back program. Thanks to investments in wind and solar power, IKEA produces as much clean energy as it uses, and may be on track to achieve climate neutrality by 2030.

IKEA Solar

Now IKEA has partnered with SunPower, one of the top national solar companies to sell solar panel systems. Taking the same simple approach that gave us flat-packed furniture with an included Allen wrench, IKEA offers four solar energy packages. The four packages include various combinations of solar panels, energy storage, and electric vehicle charging.

Eligible customers can get more information through the home solar kiosk located in the IKEA Sustainability Shop. Or they can begin online; once signed into their IKEA Family account, they will be redirected to the SunPower website to start the assessment process.

A SunPower Solar Advisor will assess the customer’s electricity bills, energy goals, and roof configuration to design their solar package. They will propose a system together with available financial products and incentives before visiting the home to assess the roof and make any necessary modifications to the design. They provide a 25-year limited warranty for panels and a 10-year limited warranty for the monitoring device and storage system.

Power Potential

IKEA already sells solar power systems in several European countries. But for now, its solar program in the U.S. will be limited to members of the IKEA Family loyalty program in select California service areas: Emeryville, East Palo Alto, West Sacramento, Burbank, Carson, Covina, Costa Mesa, and San Diego. However, IKEA has launched many of its sustainability initiatives in select locations before rolling them out nationwide or worldwide after a test period. If it does, switching to solar will be a lot more accessible to people who aren’t already steeped in the environmental movement or excited about the technical details of energy. But either way, the fact that IKEA is dipping a toe into the U.S. solar market is a sign that renewable energy is approaching a tipping point.

They have received some bad press coverage within the last few years over their methods of getting wood, so hopefully this will help with their reputation.

The blog song for today is: " Does you mother know" by ABBA

TTFN

 

"Precyclying" - a short explanation from the gang at earth911.com

A report by: Taylor Ratcliffe, he is Earth911's customer support and database manager. He is a graduate of the University of Washington....